On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/18/2010 03:58 PM, Dave Young wrote: >> >> > >> > Please patch hardware_setup() to show the value of >> > boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX). >> >> It's 0
Please wait, I reply too quick, actually it boots two times fine then one time fail. The printk only happen once. So to make sure the result I retested several times, can not get the print as well. > > Well, that's ridiculous. Looking back at your /proc/cpuinfo: > >> processor : 0 >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall lm >> constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor >> ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi >> flexpriority >> >> processor : 1 >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca >> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm >> constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor >> ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi >> flexpriority > > processor 0 doesn't have nx. > > Ingo, Peter, any ideas? Where did the missing feature go? > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
