On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:02:35PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> If it's no need to inject async #PF to PV guest we can handle
> more completed apfs at one time, so we can retry guest #PF
> as early as possible
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++++--
> virt/kvm/async_pf.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 1be0058..c95b3ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -818,7 +818,8 @@ bool kvm_is_linear_rip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned
> long linear_rip);
>
> void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> -void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +/* return true if we can handle more completed apfs, false otherwise */
> +bool kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4da8485..189664a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6265,7 +6265,7 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> -void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +bool kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> {
> trace_kvm_async_pf_ready(work->arch.token, work->gva);
> @@ -6274,13 +6274,17 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
> else
> kvm_del_async_pf_gfn(vcpu, work->arch.gfn);
>
> + vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
> +
> if ((vcpu->arch.apf.msr_val & KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED) &&
> !apf_put_user(vcpu, KVM_PV_REASON_PAGE_READY)) {
> vcpu->arch.fault.error_code = 0;
> vcpu->arch.fault.address = work->arch.token;
> kvm_inject_page_fault(vcpu);
> + return false;
> }
> - vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> index 60df9e0..d57ec92 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> @@ -123,25 +123,29 @@ void kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> void kvm_check_async_pf_completion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_async_pf *work;
> + bool ret;
>
> if (list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done) ||
> !kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(vcpu))
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> - work = list_first_entry(&vcpu->async_pf.done, typeof(*work), link);
> - list_del(&work->link);
> - spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> + do {
> + spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> + work = list_first_entry(&vcpu->async_pf.done, typeof(*work),
> + link);
> + list_del(&work->link);
> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
>
> - if (work->page)
> - kvm_arch_async_page_ready(vcpu, work);
> - kvm_arch_async_page_present(vcpu, work);
> + if (work->page)
> + kvm_arch_async_page_ready(vcpu, work);
> + ret = kvm_arch_async_page_present(vcpu, work);
>
> - list_del(&work->queue);
> - vcpu->async_pf.queued--;
> - if (work->page)
> - put_page(work->page);
> - kmem_cache_free(async_pf_cache, work);
> + list_del(&work->queue);
> + vcpu->async_pf.queued--;
> + if (work->page)
> + put_page(work->page);
> + kmem_cache_free(async_pf_cache, work);
> + } while (ret && !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done));
> }
>
No need to change kvm_arch_async_page_present() to return anything. You
can do while loop like this:
while (!list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done) &&
kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(vcpu)) {
}
If kvm_arch_async_page_present() call injects exception
kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present() will return false on next
iteration.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
