Am 09.11.2010 14:59, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 09.11.2010 14:53, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:41:26PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Clean up the srcu struct on vm destruction.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |    1 +
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> index 4111a4b..6ec58d1 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>  #else
>>>     kvm_arch_flush_shadow(kvm);
>>>  #endif
>>> +   cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu);
>>>     kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
>>>     hardware_disable_all();
>>>     mmdrop(mm);
>>> -- 
>>> 1.7.1
>>
>> kvm_arch_destroy_vm does it.
> 
> Oh, indeed.
> 
> That I guess it's time to clean up, move generic allocation and release
> into generic code. Having kvm_arch_create/destroy_vm manage the kvm
> object allocation does not look very nice (and caused this confusion of
> mine).

Oh, the setup/cleanup maze is a tribute to the IA64 zombie. Mmh...

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to