On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:38:36AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >>Anthony, Blue
> >> >>
> >> >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
> >> >
> >> >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
> >> >review it?
> >> >
> >> >IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get
> >> it right.
> >>
> >> But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed?
> >>
> >
> >The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev
> >hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bus
> >the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here:
> >http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here
> >http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Format in which list of
> >device paths is passed to firmware is documented by comment (it is very
> >simple). The only thing missing is command line option documentation. I
> >will add it and resend if no more changes are needed for patch to be
> >excepted.
>
> What about the format of the fwcfg interface? It should be
> described, and point to the references above.
>
As I said above it is described in a comment above get_boot_devices_list().
No pointers to Openfirmware there, will put them above get_fw_dev_path()
definition in qdev.h where they belong.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
