On 11/29/2010 11:18 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional
hooks and it will be too hard to keep that out of tree until all devices
get it.
That's not what I've been hearing earlier in this thread.
The responses from Yoshi indicate that Stefan's summary is correct. i.e.
the current Kemari implementation may require per-device hooks, but
that's a bug and should be fixed before merging.
It's actually really important that Kemari make use of an intermediate
layer such that the hooks can distinguish between a device access and a
recursive access.
I'm failing to understand how this is anything other than running sed over
block/*.c (or hw/*.c, depending whether you choose to rename the internal or
external API).
You're right, it's not a big deal, and requiring everything in hw use
the new interface is not a bad idea.
If a device doesn't work with Kemari, that's okay as long as the
non-Kemari case is essentially a nop.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
