On 12/05/2010 02:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>  diff --git a/config-x86-common.mak b/config-x86-common.mak
>  index b541c1c..c5508b3 100644
>  --- a/config-x86-common.mak
>  +++ b/config-x86-common.mak
>  @@ -20,9 +20,12 @@ CFLAGS += -m$(bits)
>  libgcc := $(shell $(CC) -m$(bits) --print-libgcc-file-name)
>
>  FLATLIBS = lib/libcflat.a $(libgcc)
>  -%.flat: %.o $(FLATLIBS) flat.lds
>  +%.elf: %.o $(FLATLIBS) flat.lds
>    $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -nostdlib -o $@ -Wl,-T,flat.lds $(filter %.o, $^) 
$(FLATLIBS)
>
>  +%.flat: %.elf
>  + objcopy -O elf32-i386 $^ $@

Not sure it's that great to call 32bit elf binaries ".flat". I'd rather expect a flat 
file when reading that file extension ;). Mind to just call it ".elf32"?

It's a reminder from the good old days that these were flat files loaded by kvmctl.

Alternatively, you could also use real flat files and shove a multiboot header 
into the binary.

I'll rename them in a later patch. .elf32 isn't a good name either, it implies 32-bit execution, whereas it's just the file format due to multiboot constraints. Maybe .test (and .test32 and .test64 when we build both).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to