On 12/15/2010 06:43 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
From: Takuya Yoshikawa<[email protected]>

Move slots_lock aquisition from kvm_ioapic_init() and kvm_create_pic()
to their caller.

As a result, x86's KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is now covered by a unified slots_lock
section, including kvm_setup_default_irq_routing().



I'm not sure about this...

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3300,6 +3300,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
                struct kvm_pic *vpic;

                mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+               mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);

here, the reader might wonder why we take slots_lock, since we aren't manipulating anything covered by the lock directly.

                r = -EEXIST;
                if (kvm->arch.vpic)
                        goto create_irqchip_unlock;
@@ -3308,10 +3309,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
                if (vpic) {
                        r = kvm_ioapic_init(kvm);
                        if (r) {
-                               mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);

and here, the reader might wonder why we don't take slots_lock, which protects io_bus.

Maybe we ought to move slots_lock acquisition to kvm_io_bus_register() and friends.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to