Il 04/01/2011 19:15, Dario Faggioli ha scritto:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Peter Zijlstra<[email protected]>
To: Rik van Riel<[email protected]>
Cc: Hillf Danton<[email protected]>,[email protected],
[email protected], Avi Kiviti<[email protected]>, Srivatsa
Vaddagiri<[email protected]>, Mike Galbraith<[email protected]>,
Chris Wright<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:05:54 +0100
RT guests don't make sense, there's nowhere near enough infrastructure
for that to work well.
I'd argue that KVM running with RT priority is a bug.
Peter, can I ask why did you state that ? In the IRMOS project, we
are just deploying KVM VMs by using the Fabio's real-time scheduler
(for others, a.k.a., the Fabio's EDF throttling patch, or IRMOS RT
scheduler)
in order to let the VMs get precise CPU scheduling guarantees by the
kernel. So, in this context we do have KVM running at RT priority, and
we do have experimental results showing how this can improve stability
of performance of the hosted guest VMs.
Of course, don't misunderstand me: this is a necessary condition for a
stable performance of KVM VMs, I'm not saying it is sufficient for
--
Tommaso Cucinotta, Computer Engineering PhD, Researcher
ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
Tel +39 050 882 024, Fax +39 050 882 003
http://retis.sssup.it/people/tommaso
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
