On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> - asynchronous page faults, which allow a guest to continue processing
> interrupts even when its memory is being paged in; in the case of a Linux
> 2.6.38+ guest, it will receive a notification that the host is servicing a
> page fault, and may switch into another guest process
So quite frankly, I don't like how this was done.
When you touch files like mm/memory.c, you don't just touch them. You
get sign-offs and acks from the VM maintainers. Seriously.
In this case, I pulled, looked, and then unpulled. I just don't want
it, and I think the new FAULT_FLAG_MINOR is seriously mis-named and
hacky.
Is it about atomicity? Is it about IO? Why wasn't I notified
before-hand? Was Andrew cc'd?
Not pulled.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
