On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 03:54 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:53:08PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 01/11/2011 03:30 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >+
> >> >+asm (
> >> >+ ".global resume_start\n"
> >> >+ ".global resume_end\n"
> >> >+ ".code16\n"
> >> >+ "resume_start:\n"
> >> >+ "mov 0x0, %eax\n"
> >> >+ "mov $0xf4, %dx\n"
> >> >+ "out %eax, %dx\n"
> >> >+ "1: hlt\n"
> >> >+ "jmp 1b\n"
> >> >+ "resume_end:\n"
> >> >+#ifdef __i386__
> >> >+ ".code32\n"
> >> >+#else
> >> >+ ".code64\n"
> >> >+#endif
> >> >+ );
> >>
> >> Is this a kvm unit test or a qemu unit test?
> >>
> >Both? Is this a bad thing?
>
> We may want to move non-kvm tests to qemu.git. Though all of the
> non-api tests work equally for qemu and kvm.
>
We will have to maintain two separate unit test infrastructures then.
We can make x86/qemu or x86/device-model subdir in kvm-unit-test.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
