On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Yes, I think doing this in the host is much simpler,
> just send an interrupt after there's a decent amount
> of space in the queue.
> 
> Having said that the simple heuristic that I coded
> might be a bit too simple.

>From the debugging out what I have seen so far (a single small message
TCP_STEAM test), I think the right approach is to patch both guest and
vhost. The problem I have found is a regression for single  small
message TCP_STEAM test. Old kernel works well for TCP_STREAM, only new
kernel has problem.

For Steven's problem, it's multiple stream TCP_RR issues, the old guest
doesn't perform well, so does new guest kernel. We tested reducing vhost
signaling patch before, it didn't help the performance at all.

Thanks
Shirley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to