On 02/16/2011 06:51 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:01:47AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 02/15/2011 10:36 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>  >On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 04:42:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  >>   Short-circuit an STI; HLT sequence while an interrupt is pending:
>  >>   instead of halting, re-entering the guest, and exiting immediately
>  >>   on an interrupt window exit, go directly to the last step.
>  >>
>  >>   Saves a vmexit on workloads where interrupts are received synchronously;
>  >>   an example is a disk backed by the host page cache where there is no
>  >>   latency (from the guest's point of view) between the request and 
fulfilment.
>  >>
>  >>   Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<[email protected]>
>  >>   ---
>  >>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |    9 +++++++++
>  >>    1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  >>
>  >>   diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>  >>   index ee1cd1a..541da0e 100644
>  >>   --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>  >>   +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>  >>   @@ -3437,6 +3437,15 @@ static int handle_interrupt_window(struct 
kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  >>    static int handle_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  >>    {
>  >>          skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>  >>   +      /*
>  >>   +       * Short-circuit an STI; HLT sequence while an interrupt is 
pending:
>  >>   +       * instead of halting, re-entering the guest, and exiting 
immediately
>  >>   +       * on an interrupt window exit, go directly to the last step.
>  >>   +       */
>  >>   +      if ((to_vmx(vcpu)->cpu_based_vm_exec_control
>  >>   +      &   CPU_BASED_VIRTUAL_INTR_PENDING)
>  >>   +      &&   (kvm_get_rflags(vcpu)&   X86_EFLAGS_IF))
>  >>   +              return handle_interrupt_window(vcpu);
>  >>          return kvm_emulate_halt(vcpu);
>  >>    }
>  >
>  >Why does the normal vcpu entry path fails to inject the interrupt? Because 
after halt,
>  >KVM_REQ_EVENT is not set?
>
>  Yes.  Also, we want to clear CPU_BASED_VIRTUAL_INTR_PENDING.

Is there a reason why it cannot be handled in the main loop?

Don't follow.  What are you suggesting?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to