On 02/27/2011 04:01 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/27/2011 06:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/24/2011 11:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<aligu...@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/lib/x86/io.h b/lib/x86/io.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bd6341c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/x86/io.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#ifndef IO_H
+#define IO_H
+
+static inline unsigned char inb(unsigned short port)
+{
+ unsigned char value;
+ asm volatile("inb %w1, %0" : "=a" (value) : "Nd" (port));
+ return value;
+}
Are those %[wb] really needed? gcc should do the right thing based
on the argument type.
It's just a little extra type safety.
Yeah, but those constraints aren't really documented. Linux does use
them in a handful of places so they're unlikely to go away though.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
