On 03/06/2011 08:28 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:

>>   static int mapping_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t large_gfn)
>> @@ -2155,9 +2166,8 @@ pte_prefetch_gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
>> gfn_t gfn, bool no_dirty_log)
>>   {
>>       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
>>
>> -    slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
>> -    if (!slot || slot->flags&  KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID ||
>> -          (no_dirty_log&&  slot->dirty_bitmap))
>> +    slot = gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(vcpu, gfn, no_dirty_log);
>> +    if (slot&&  slot->flags&  KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
>>           slot = NULL;
>>
>>       return slot;
> 
> For a unification this adds a lot of code... I think the result is more 
> complicated than the starting point.
> 

After more thinking, i think we can move 'slot->flags&  KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID'
into the common function, since the later gva_to_pfn also can filter this out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to