On 2011-04-17 11:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 02:32 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka<[email protected]>
>>
>> If kvm_arch_vcpu_setup failed, we leaked the allocated VCPU structure so
>> far.
> 
>> @@ -1609,18 +1609,18 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm
>> *kvm, u32 id)
>>
>>       r = kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(vcpu);
>>       if (r)
>> -        return r;
>> +        goto vcpu_destroy;
>>
> 
> kvm_arch_vcpu_setup() (at least x86's) does a vcpu->free() on failure. 
> I think the current code is correct (if confusing).

Right. How about cleaning this inconsistency up? It looks like there is
no problem calling kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy even if kvm_arch_vcpu_setup
bailed out early.

Jan

------8<------

From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>

So far kvm_arch_vcpu_setup is responsible for freeing the vcpu struct if
it fails. Move this confusing resonsibility back into the hands of
kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu. Only kvm_arch_vcpu_setup of x86 is affected,
all other archs cannot fail.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c  |    5 -----
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |   11 ++++++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1d5a7f4..9826d5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6002,12 +6002,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        if (r == 0)
                r = kvm_mmu_setup(vcpu);
        vcpu_put(vcpu);
-       if (r < 0)
-               goto free_vcpu;
 
-       return 0;
-free_vcpu:
-       kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_free(vcpu);
        return r;
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 5814645..57b173c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1609,18 +1609,18 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, 
u32 id)
 
        r = kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(vcpu);
        if (r)
-               return r;
+               goto vcpu_destroy;
 
        mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
        if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) == KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
                r = -EINVAL;
-               goto vcpu_destroy;
+               goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
        }
 
        kvm_for_each_vcpu(r, v, kvm)
                if (v->vcpu_id == id) {
                        r = -EEXIST;
-                       goto vcpu_destroy;
+                       goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
                }
 
        BUG_ON(kvm->vcpus[atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)]);
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 
id)
        r = create_vcpu_fd(vcpu);
        if (r < 0) {
                kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
-               goto vcpu_destroy;
+               goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
        }
 
        kvm->vcpus[atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)] = vcpu;
@@ -1644,8 +1644,9 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 
id)
        mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
        return r;
 
-vcpu_destroy:
+unlock_vcpu_destroy:
        mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+vcpu_destroy:
        kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
        return r;
 }
-- 
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to