On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:18:25PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Okay, truly excellent. The code is now a lot more readable, and I'm
> almost beginning to understand it. The code comments are also very
> good, I wish we had the same quality comments in the rest of kvm.
> We can probably merge the next iteration if there aren't significant
> comments from others.
>
I still feel that interrupt injection path should be reworked to be
SVM like before merging the code.
> The only worrying thing is the issue you raise in patch 8. Is there
> a simple fix you can push that addresses correctness?
>
> --
> I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
> signature is too narrow to contain.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
