On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:57 +0100, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> > Assuming the data is just mixed up, I'm not completely happy that
> > we're making random seeks almost 5% slower. Any ideas why that's
> > happening?
>
> Yes they are mixed.
>
> I am assuming, probably delay while caching.
That doesn't make sense to me. Why would "caching delay" be
significantly slower than the non-cached version where we do full read
all the time? Maybe I didn't quite understand the code but that sounds
like a bug lurking somewhere in the caching code - maybe we cache too
much or something?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
