On 15 June 2011 09:35, Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 14.06.2011, at 19:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> return 0;
>> @@ -7058,18 +7056,14 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long
>> arg1,
>> case TARGET_NR_osf_sigprocmask:
>> {
>> abi_ulong mask;
>> - int how = arg1;
>> sigset_t set, oldset;
>>
>> switch(arg1) {
>> case TARGET_SIG_BLOCK:
>> - how = SIG_BLOCK;
>> break;
>> case TARGET_SIG_UNBLOCK:
>> - how = SIG_UNBLOCK;
>> break;
>> case TARGET_SIG_SETMASK:
>> - how = SIG_SETMASK;
>
> why go through the effort of setting "how" and then not using it? I'm pretty
> sure this is a bug as well. A few lines down is the following code:
>
> sigprocmask(arg1, &set, &oldset);
>
> which in TARGET_NR_sigprocmask would be:
>
> ret = get_errno(sigprocmask(how, &set, &oldset));
>
> So we end up sending guest masks to the host.
Yes, this change is wrong. We've had a better version of these
fixes posted to the list already by Juan:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98376/
at least some of which have already been reviewed.
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
