On 06/29/2011 05:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 05:35 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Use rcu to protect shadow pages table to be freed, so we can safely walk it,
>> it should run fastly and is needed by mmio page fault
>>
>
>> static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct list_head *invalid_list)
>> {
>> @@ -1767,6 +1874,14 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>>
>> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>>
>> + if (atomic_read(&kvm->arch.reader_counter)) {
>> + kvm_mmu_isolate_pages(invalid_list);
>> + sp = list_first_entry(invalid_list, struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
>> + list_del_init(invalid_list);
>> + call_rcu(&sp->rcu, free_pages_rcu);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>
> I think we should do this unconditionally. The cost of ping-ponging the
> shared cache line containing reader_counter will increase with large smp
> counts. On the other hand, zap_page is very rare, so it can be a little
> slower. Also, less code paths = easier to understand.
>
On soft mmu, zap_page is very frequently, it can cause performance regression
in my test.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
