On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:18:41AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 01:39 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >> -static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
> >> +static void track_spte_bits(u64 old_spte, u64 keep_bits, bool
> >> always_track)
> >> {
> >> - return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
> >> + if (always_track ||
> >> + (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, keep_bits, shadow_accessed_mask)))
> >> + kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
> >> +
> >> + if (always_track ||
> >> + (spte_is_bit_cleared(old_spte, keep_bits, shadow_dirty_mask)))
> >> + kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
> >> +}
> >
> > This is much more confusing than previously, please drop it.
> >
>
> What about remove "always_track" parameter? After that, the code should be
> clear.
Its easier to read by having it opencoded as it is now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
