* Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Same here - in fact i first asked Qemu to be put into
> >> tools/qemu/ so that it all becomes more hackable and more usable
> >> - that suggestion was rebuked very strongly.
> >
> > So instead of thinking a bit and trying to realize that there
> > might be a reason people don't want all their user space in the
> > kernel tree you go ahead and start your own crusade of creating a
> > new user space. Great. That's how I always hoped Linux would be
> > :(.
>
> Damn you Ingo Molnar, I knew you'd somehow get all the credit for
> our hard work! ;-)
Yeah, i'm really just a user and code reviewer of tools/kvm/, in
terms of actual commits i'm barely on the radar compared to the
massive contributions of Pekka, Sasha, Asias, Cyrill and others.
> More seriously, though, I fail to see what's bothering you
> Alexander. I and Ingo already mentioned we wouldn't be hacking on
> Qemu even if there wasn't no tools/kvm. It's not as if we're
> putting *your* user space code into the kernel tree - we wrote our
> own! What's wrong with that?
That puzzles me as well.
If tools/kvm/ is really such a bad approach then it will just wither
and die, like one of the thousand stale drivers we have in the kernel
- or like lguest it ends up as a cool hack that didnt quite make it.
Judging by the many contributions tools/kvm/ has already attracted in
its limited form an out of tree project i'd not bet on that outcome
though.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
