* Alexander Graf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 25.07.2011, at 12:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> So it was a no brainer for me to pull it into -tip.
> >>
> >> The thing I don't agree with is that it should live in the
> >> kernel tree.
> >
> > FYI, tools/kvm/ *already* lives in the kernel tree - that is how
> > it's developed and used and it also shares code with the kernel.
>
> So you're just trying to make this a self-fulfilling prophecy now?
No, i'm just trying to point out to you that it's already a fact that
the tool already lives in a kernel tree and was developed there to
the tune of 700+ commits within a few short months.
IMO you should not be arguing:
'You should do X because that's my preference.'
IMO you should be arguing:
'You should do X because technical advantage Y which is important to the
project.'
We have listed numerous technical advantages of why we have chosen
tools/kvm/ - and you have not countered that with any convincing
technical disadvantage so far.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
