On 07/27/2011 03:01 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> > -static inline struct kvm_pic *to_pic(struct kvm_io_device *dev)
> > +static inline struct kvm_pic *to_pic(struct kvm_io_device *dev, gpa_t
addr)
> > {
> > - return container_of(dev, struct kvm_pic, dev);
> > + switch (addr) {
> > + case 0x20:
> > + case 0x21:
> > + return container_of(dev, struct kvm_pic, dev_master);
> > + case 0xa0:
> > + case 0xa1:
> > + return container_of(dev, struct kvm_pic, dev_slave);
> > + case 0x4d0:
> > + case 0x4d1:
> > + return container_of(dev, struct kvm_pic, dev_eclr);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > }
>
> Somewhat ugly. I think
>
> int picdev_write_master(...)
> {
> return pcidev_write(container_of(...), ...);
> }
>
> is nicer, no?
It would mean we need a total of 6 wrappers for master, slave and eclr
instead of this switch, if that sounds ok I'll change it.
IMO, they're better than the switch.
>
>
> > if (ret< 0)
> > goto out_free_dev;
> > list_add_tail(&dev->list,&kvm->coalesced_zones);
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > index 73358d2..f59c1e8 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> > @@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ kvm_assign_ioeventfd(struct kvm *kvm, struct
kvm_ioeventfd *args)
> >
> > kvm_iodevice_init(&p->dev,&ioeventfd_ops);
> >
> > - ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, bus_idx,&p->dev);
> > + ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, bus_idx, p->addr, p->length,
> > + &p->dev);
>
> Should this be p->length or 1?
We register p->length since when we process a write, the operation
should be fully contained within the IO space of the device.
We verify that the write happens on the first byte within ioeventfd
write handler.
Ok.
>
> > #include<asm/processor.h>
> > #include<asm/io.h>
> > @@ -2391,24 +2393,94 @@ static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus
*bus)
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i< bus->dev_count; i++) {
> > - struct kvm_io_device *pos = bus->devs[i];
> > + struct kvm_io_device *pos = bus->range[i].dev;
> >
>
> This will call the destructor three times for the PIC. Is this safe?
PIC doesn't have a destructor for devices, the code above just does
nothing for PIC devices.
Ok.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
