On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 23:52 -0500, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > Isn't ivshmem in QEMU? If so, then I don't think there isn't any
> > competition. How do you feel that these are competing?
>
> Well, it means that you will inside the guest have two different
> devices depending whether you're using QEMU or kvm-tool. I don't see
> the point in exposing different devices to the guest just because of
> NIH. Why should a guest care which device emulation framework you're
> using?
It's a pretty special-purpose device that requires user configuration so
I don't consider QEMU compatibility to be mandatory. It'd be nice to
have but not something to bend over backwards for.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
