On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 23:19 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:05:00PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 23:03 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:58:31PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > By "actual addressing model" I meant checking the ICR of of each APIC to
> > > > see if we should address it logically or physically.
> > > > 
> > > This is definitely not what ICR of each APIC is about.
> > 
> > Thats what I understood from section 10.6.2 in the spec.
> > 
> Section 10.6.2 talks about ACPI messages generated by a CPU (IPIs) not
> about addressing mode of the CPU itself (which is, again, per message).

Right, but it was referred to by section 10.11.1, that's why I assumed
so.

Anyway, I'll just replace the patch with what you've initially
suggested, so it would be contained within kvm_set_msi().

-- 

Sasha.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to