On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 07:25 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:54:59PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:43:11 +0800, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > This make let virtio-net driver can send gratituous packet by a new > > > config bit - VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE in each config update > > > interrupt. When this bit is set by backend, the driver would schedule > > > a workqueue to send gratituous packet through NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS. > > > > > > This feature is negotiated through bit VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> > > > > This seems like a huge layering violation. Imagine this in real > > hardware, for example. > > commits 06c4648d46d1b757d6b9591a86810be79818b60c > and 99606477a5888b0ead0284fecb13417b1da8e3af > document the need for this: > > NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS notifier indicates that a device moved to a > different physical link. > and > In real hardware such notifications are only > generated when the device comes up or the address changes. > > So hypervisor could get the same behaviour by sending link up/down > events, this is just an optimization so guest won't do > unecessary stuff like try to reconfigure an IP address. > > > Maybe LOCATION_CHANGE would be a better name? [...]
We also use this in bonding failover, where the system location doesn't change but a different link is used. However, I do recognise that the name ought to indicate what kind of change happened and not what the expected action is. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
