On 11/10/2011 01:03 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011, Avi Kivity wrote about "Re: [PATCH 04/10] nEPT: Fix
> page table format in nested EPT":
> > > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
> > > bool nx;
> > >
> > > u64 pdptrs[4]; /* pae */
> > > + u64 link_shadow_page_set_bits;
> >...
> > > +static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64
> > > set_bits)
> > > {
> > > - u64 spte;
> > > -
> > > - spte = __pa(sp->spt)
> > > - | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
> > > - | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
> > > - mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
> > > + mmu_spte_set(sptep, __pa(sp->spt) | set_bits);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Minor nit: you can just use link_shadow_page_set_bits here instead of
> > passing it around (unless later you have a different value for the
> > parameter?)
>
> The problem was that link_shadow_page did not take an kvm_mmu parameter,
> so I don't know where to find this link_shadow_page_set_bits. So either
> I pass the pointer to the entire kvm_mmu to link_shadow_page, or I just
> pass the only field which I need... I thought that passing the single
> field I need was cleaner - but I can easily change it if you prefer to
> pass the kvm_mmu.
Ah, doesn't matter either way.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
