On 2011-10-23 17:39, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
> ---
> target-i386/kvm.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 82fec8c..c061e3b 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include "hw/pc.h"
> #include "hw/apic.h"
> #include "ioport.h"
> +#include "hyperv.h"
>
> //#define DEBUG_KVM
>
> @@ -380,11 +381,16 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
> cpuid_i = 0;
>
> /* Paravirtualization CPUIDs */
> - memcpy(signature, "KVMKVMKVM\0\0\0", 12);
> c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> c->function = KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE;
> - c->eax = 0;
> + if (!hyperv_enabled()) {
> + memcpy(signature, "KVMKVMKVM\0\0\0", 12);
> + c->eax = 0;
> + } else {
> + memcpy(signature, "Microsoft Hv", 12);
> + c->eax = HYPERV_CPUID_MIN;
> + }
> c->ebx = signature[0];
> c->ecx = signature[1];
> c->edx = signature[2];
> @@ -395,6 +401,54 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
> c->eax = env->cpuid_kvm_features &
> kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(s, KVM_CPUID_FEATURES, 0, R_EAX);
>
> + if (hyperv_enabled()) {
> + memcpy(signature, "Hv#1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 12);
> + c->eax = signature[0];
> +
> + c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> + c->function = HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION;
> + c->eax = 0x00001bbc;
> + c->ebx = 0x00060001;
> +
> + c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> + c->function = HYPERV_CPUID_FEATURES;
> + if (hyperv_relaxed_timing_enabled()) {
> + c->eax |= HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE;
> + }
> + if (hyperv_vapic_recommended()) {
> + c->eax |= HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE;
> + c->eax |= HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ACCESS_AVAILABLE;
> + }
> +
> + c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> + c->function = HYPERV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO;
> + if (hyperv_relaxed_timing_enabled()) {
> + c->eax |= HV_X64_RELAXED_TIMING_RECOMMENDED;
> + }
> + if (hyperv_vapic_recommended()) {
> + c->eax |= HV_X64_APIC_ACCESS_RECOMMENDED;
> + }
> + c->ebx = hyperv_get_spinlock_retries();
> +
> + c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> + c->function = HYPERV_CPUID_IMPLEMENT_LIMITS;
> + c->eax = 0x40;
> + c->ebx = 0x40;
> +
> + c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++];
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c));
> + c->function = KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE_NEXT;
> + memcpy(signature, "KVMKVMKVM\0\0\0", 12);
> + c->eax = 0;
> + c->ebx = signature[0];
> + c->ecx = signature[1];
> + c->edx = signature[2];
> + }
> +
> has_msr_async_pf_en = c->eax & (1 << KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF);
>
> cpu_x86_cpuid(env, 0, 0, &limit, &unused, &unused, &unused);
> @@ -953,6 +1007,13 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(CPUState *env, int level)
> kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN,
> env->async_pf_en_msr);
> }
> + if (hyperv_hypercall_available()) {
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, 0);
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL, 0);
> + }
> + if (hyperv_vapic_recommended()) {
> + kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE, 0);
> + }
> }
> if (env->mcg_cap) {
> int i;
> @@ -1190,6 +1251,14 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(CPUState *env)
> msrs[n++].index = MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN;
> }
>
> + if (hyperv_hypercall_available()) {
> + msrs[n++].index = HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID;
> + msrs[n++].index = HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL;
> + }
> + if (hyperv_vapic_recommended()) {
> + msrs[n++].index = HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE;
> + }
> +
> if (env->mcg_cap) {
> msrs[n++].index = MSR_MCG_STATUS;
> msrs[n++].index = MSR_MCG_CTL;
Not sure if we discussed this already: Is there no need to save/restore
the HV MSR values in the vcpu structure? Specifcially kvm_get_msrs looks
fishy as you request to read the state from the kernel but then simply
ignore it.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html