On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
> > > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
> > > for further code clean up.
> > > 
> > > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
> > > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c |   12 ++++++------
> > >  net/socket.c           |    4 ++--
> > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Thanks !
> 
> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? 

Kaber, David: 
I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a
favor? 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to