(2011/11/14 19:07), Avi Kivity wrote:
@@ -1491,7 +1492,8 @@ void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
        if (memslot&&  memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
                unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;

-               __set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap);
+               if (!__test_and_set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap))
+                       memslot->nr_dirty_pages++;
        }
  }


[snip]

btw mark_page_dirty() itself seems to assume mmu_lock protection that
doesn't exist.  Marcelo?


I want to hear the answer for this question.

Though I myself is reading the code, I cannot understand it thoroughly yet.
I wish if there were mmu_lock entry in locking.txt ...

        Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to