On 02/17/2012 03:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > Should this be a kvm_make_request instead (with a separate > pending_doorbell bool in vcpu that msgclr can act on), considering > earlier discussion of phasing out atomics on pending_exceptions, in > favor of requests?
Ignore the bit about msgclr -- it acts on the local vcpu, so no need for pending_doorbell. It can just be a plain request. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
