On 08/03/12 12:45, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
> 
> Since most guests will have paging enabled for memory management, add 
> likely() optimization
> around CR0.PG checks.

>  {
> -     return kvm_read_cr0_bits(vcpu, X86_CR0_PG);
> +     return likely(kvm_read_cr0_bits(vcpu, X86_CR0_PG));


IMHO likely/unlikely should be considered more as fast-path/slow-path and not 
as often/less often.
Is that the case here? This patch  might cause a mis-prediction for non-paging 
guests all 
the time. 

Non-paging might be really irrelevant, so I am just making a point, since
likely/unlikely is mis-used too often especially for "most users do it that 
way".


Christian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to