Rather than just making all of c9 read-zero/write-discard, this changes
it to the explicit profiling registers we need.  This is a start for the
future implementation were we actually implement performance monitoring,
and makes sure we're not discarding important things.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c
index aec1b6e..4bdab8f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -238,6 +238,64 @@ static bool read_l2ctlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
        return true;
 }
 
+static bool read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                     const struct coproc_params *p,
+                     unsigned long arg)
+{
+       u32 imp, idcode, num;
+
+       imp = (vcpu->arch.cp15[c0_MIDR] & 0xFF000000) >> 24;
+       idcode = (vcpu->arch.cp15[c0_MIDR] & 0x00000FF0) >> 4;
+       /* No counters. */
+       num = 0;
+
+       /* Other bits are at reset value. */
+       *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = (imp << 24) | (idcode << 16) | (num << 11);
+       return true;
+}
+
+/* FIXME: We ignore them enabling performance monitoring. */
+static bool write_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                      const struct coproc_params *p,
+                      unsigned long arg)
+{
+       u32 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1);
+
+       kvm_debug("pmcr write:%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
+                 val & (1 << 5) ? " DP" : "",
+                 val & (1 << 4) ? " X" : "",
+                 val & (1 << 3) ? " D" : "",
+                 val & (1 << 2) ? " C" : "",
+                 val & (1 << 1) ? " P" : "",
+                 val & (1 << 0) ? " E" : "");
+       return true;
+}
+
+static bool read_pmcntenclr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                           const struct coproc_params *p,
+                           unsigned long arg)
+{
+       /* Cycle counter is off, there are no others. */
+       *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt1) = 0;
+       return true;
+}
+
+static bool write_pmcntenclr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                           const struct coproc_params *p,
+                           unsigned long arg)
+{
+       /* Writing a 1 means disable a counter.  That's cool. */
+       return true;
+}
+       
+static bool write_pmintenclr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                            const struct coproc_params *p,
+                            unsigned long arg)
+{
+       /* Writing a 1 means disable an overflow interrupt.  That's cool. */
+       return true;
+}
+
 static bool access_cp15_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
                            const struct coproc_params *p,
                            unsigned long cp15_reg)
@@ -279,13 +337,18 @@ struct coproc_emulate {
 static const struct coproc_emulate coproc_emulate[] = {
        /*
         * L2CTLR access (guest wants to know #CPUs).
-        *
-        * FIXME: Hack Alert: Read zero as default case.
         */
        { CRn( 9), CRm( 0), Op1( 1), Op2( 2), is32,  READ,  read_l2ctlr},
        { CRn( 9), CRm(DF), Op1(DF), Op2(DF), is32,  WRITE, ignore_write},
        { CRn( 9), CRm(DF), Op1(DF), Op2(DF), is32,  READ,  read_zero},
 
+       /* Guest reads/writes PMU, assuming there will be one. */
+       { CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32,  READ,  read_pmcr},
+       { CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2( 0), is32,  WRITE, write_pmcr},
+       { CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32,  READ,  read_pmcntenclr},
+       { CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32,  WRITE, write_pmcntenclr},
+       { CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op1( 0), Op2( 2), is32,  WRITE, write_pmintenclr},
+
        /*
         * These CRn == 10 entries may not need to exist - if we can
         * ignore guest attempts to tamper with TLB lockdowns then it
-- 
  How could I marry someone with more hair than me?  http://baldalex.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to