Il 23/04/2012 16:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> +/* Our own copy of __test_and_clear_bit to make sure
> + * it is done with a single instruction */

Is this for microoptimization or correctness?  If the latter, it does
not ensure anything without a "lock" prefix.

Paolo

> +static inline int kvm_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile u16* addr)
> +{
> +     int oldbit;
> +
> +     asm volatile("btr %2,%1\n\t"
> +                  "sbb %0,%0"
> +                  : "=r" (oldbit), BITOP_ADDR_CONSTRAINT(*addr) : "Ir" (nr));
> +     return oldbit;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to