On 26.06.2012, at 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote:

> From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
> 
> Only if the sensed cpu is not running a status is stored, which
> is reflected by condition code 1. If the cpu is running, condition
> code 0 should be returned.
> Just the opposite of what the code is doing.
> 
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>

Yikes. Is this a stable candidate?


Alex

> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c |    4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
> index fda1d64..caccc0e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
> @@ -268,12 +268,12 @@ static int __sigp_sense_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> u16 cpu_addr,
>               if (atomic_read(fi->local_int[cpu_addr]->cpuflags)
>                   & CPUSTAT_RUNNING) {
>                       /* running */
> -                     rc = 1;
> +                     rc = 0;
>               } else {
>                       /* not running */
>                       *reg &= 0xffffffff00000000UL;
>                       *reg |= SIGP_STATUS_NOT_RUNNING;
> -                     rc = 0;
> +                     rc = 1;
>               }
>       }
>       spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to