On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:01:27PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> "rep ins" emulation is going through emulator now. This is slow because
> emulator knows how to write back only one datum at a time. This patch
> provides fast path for the instruction in certain conditions. The
> conditions are: DF flag is not set, destination memory is RAM and single
> datum does not cross page boundary. If fast path code fails it falls
> back to emulation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    6 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              |   20 +++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |   25 +++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 7a41878..f3e7bb3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1887,21 +1887,31 @@ static int io_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
>       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
>       u32 io_info = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1; /* address size bug? */
> -     int size, in, string;
> +     int size, in, string, rep;
>       unsigned port;
>  
>       ++svm->vcpu.stat.io_exits;
>       string = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_STR_MASK) != 0;
> +     rep = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_REP_MASK) != 0;
>       in = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_TYPE_MASK) != 0;
> -     if (string || in)
> -             return emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0) == EMULATE_DONE;
>  
>       port = io_info >> 16;
>       size = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_SIZE_MASK) >> SVM_IOIO_SIZE_SHIFT;
>       svm->next_rip = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2;
> -     skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
>  
> -     return kvm_fast_pio_out(vcpu, size, port);
> +     if (!string && !in) {
> +             skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
> +             return kvm_fast_pio_out(vcpu, size, port);
> +     } else if (string && in && rep) {

Is there a reason to restrict optimization to rep ? That is, 
it should be easy to extend to normal in?

> +             kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> +             return EMULATE_DONE;
> +     }
> +     if (kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) & X86_EFLAGS_DF)
> +             return EMULATE_FAIL;
> +     if (ad_bytes_idx > 2)
> +             return EMULATE_FAIL;
> +
> +     ad_bytes = (u8[]){2, 4, 8}[ad_bytes_idx];
> +
> +     rdi = kvm_address_mask(ad_bytes, rdi);
> +
> +     count = (PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(rdi))/size;
> +
> +     if (count == 0) /* 'in' crosses page boundry */
> +             return EMULATE_FAIL;
> +
> +     count = min(count, kvm_address_mask(ad_bytes, rcx));
> + 
> +     r = kvm_linearize_address(vcpu, get_emulation_mode(vcpu),
> +                     rdi, VCPU_SREG_ES, count, true, false, ad_bytes,
> +                     &linear_addr);

kvm_linearize_address expects size parameter in bytes?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to