On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 8 August 2012 07:25, Liu Ping Fan <qemul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +static inline void atomic_sub(int i, Atomic *v)
>> +{
>> + asm volatile("lock; subl %1,%0"
>> + : "+m" (v->counter)
>> + : "ir" (i));
>> +}
>
> NAK. We don't want random inline assembly implementations of locking
> primitives in QEMU, they are way too hard to keep working with all the
> possible host architectures we support. I spent some time a while back
> getting rid of the (variously busted) versions we had previously.
>
> If you absolutely must use atomic ops, use the gcc builtins. For
> preference, stick to higher level and less error-prone abstractions.
We're spoilt for choice here:
1. Atomic built-ins from gcc
2. glib atomics
No need to roll our own or copy the implementation from the kernel.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
