On 08/21/2012 02:25 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote: > > kernbench(lower is better) > ========================== > base pvflushv4 %improvement > 1VM 48.5800 46.8513 3.55846 > 2VM 108.1823 104.6410 3.27346 > 3VM 183.2733 163.3547 10.86825 > > ebizzy(higher is better) > ======================== > base pvflushv4 %improvement > 1VM 2414.5000 2089.8750 -13.44481 > 2VM 2167.6250 2371.7500 9.41699 > 3VM 1600.1111 2102.5556 31.40060 >
The regression is worrying. We're improving the contended case at the cost of the non-contended case, this is usually the wrong thing to do. Do we have any clear idea of the cause of the regression? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
