Marcelo,
You are suggesting that I:
Kvm_host.h:
Struct kvm_x86_ops {
...
change
Int (*set_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu * vcpu, u32 mrs_index, u64 data);
to
Int (*set_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu * vcpu, u32 mrs_index, u64 data, bool
from_guest);
...
};
and so on down the line to set_msr_common(), kvm_write_tsc()... in a separate
patch before other related patches?
As far as the initialization after live migration, I will provide some output
with explanation once I am able to again. At the moment, I have hosed my system
and need to figure out what's wrong and fix it first.
Thanks,
Will
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcelo Tosatti [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:53 AM
To: Auld, Will
Cc: Avi Kivity; [email protected]; Zhang, Xiantao; Liu, Jinsong
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enabling IA32_TSC_ADJUST for guest VM
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:10:30PM +0000, Auld, Will wrote:
> I am just testing the second version of this patch. It addresses all the
> comments so far except Marcelo's issue with breaking the function
> compute_guest_tsc().
Lets try to merge the missing patch from Zachary first (that'll make it clear).
>
> I needed to put the call for updating the TSC_ADJUST_MSR in kvm_write_tsc()
> to ensure it is only called from user space. Other changes added to vmcs
> offset should not be tracked in TSC_ADJUST_MSR.
Please have a separate, earlier patch making that explicit (by passing a bool
to kvm_x86_ops->set_msr then to kvm_set_msr_common). "that" = whether msr write
is guest initiated or not.
> I had some trouble with the order of initialization during live migration.
> TSC_ADJUST is initialized first but then wiped out by multiple
> initializations of tsc. The fix for this is to not update TSC_ADJUST if the
> vmcs offset is not actually changing with the tsc write. So, after migration
> outcome is that vmcs offset gets defined independent from the migrating value
> of TSC_ADJUST. I believe this is what we want to happen.
Can you please be more explicit regarding "wiped out by multiple
initializations of tsc" ?
It is probably best to maintain TSC_ADJUST separately, in software, and then
calculate TSC_OFFSET.
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:12 AM
> To: Marcelo Tosatti
> Cc: Auld, Will; [email protected]; Zhang, Xiantao
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enabling IA32_TSC_ADJUST for guest VM
>
> On 10/08/2012 07:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > From Intel's manual:
> >
> > • If an execution of WRMSR to the IA32_TIME_STAMP_COUNTER MSR adds
> > (or
> > subtracts) value X from the TSC,
> > the logical processor also adds (or subtracts) value X from the
> > IA32_TSC_ADJUST MSR.
> >
> > This is not handled in the patch.
> >
> > To support migration, it will be necessary to differentiate between
> > guest initiated and userspace-model initiated msr write. That is,
> > only guest initiated TSC writes should affect the value of
> > IA32_TSC_ADJUST MSR.
> >
> > Avi, any better idea?
> >
>
> I think we need that anyway, since there are some read-only MSRs that need to
> be configured by the host (nvmx capabilities). So if we add that feature it
> will be useful elsewhere. I don't think it's possible to do it in any other
> way:
>
> "Local offset value of the IA32_TSC for a logical processor. Reset value is
> Zero. A write to IA32_TSC will modify the local offset in IA32_TSC_ADJUST and
> the content of IA32_TSC, but does not affect the internal invariant TSC
> hardware."
>
> What we want to do is affect the internal invariant TSC hardware, so we can't
> do that through the normal means.
>
> btw, will tsc writes from userspace (after live migration) cause tsc skew?
> If so we should think how to model a guest-wide tsc.
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
> N?????r??y????b?X??ǧv?^?){.n?+????h????ܨ}???Ơz?&j:+v???
> ????zZ+??+zf???h???~????i???z? ?w?????????&?)ߢf
