On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:59:35PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 05:13 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Improve performance of time system calls when using Linux pvclock,
> > by reading time info from fixmap visible copy of pvclock data.
> >
> > Originally from Jeremy Fitzhardinge.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Index: vsyscall/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- vsyscall.orig/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> > +++ vsyscall/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include <asm/hpet.h>
> > #include <asm/unistd.h>
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> > +#include <asm/pvclock.h>
> >
> > #define gtod (&VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data))
> >
> > @@ -62,6 +63,69 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_hpet(void)
> > return readl((const void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_HPET) + 0xf0);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK_VSYSCALL
> > +
> > +static notrace const struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *get_pvti(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + const aligned_pvti_t *pvti_base;
> > + int idx = cpu / (PAGE_SIZE/PVTI_SIZE);
> > + int offset = cpu % (PAGE_SIZE/PVTI_SIZE);
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(PVCLOCK_FIXMAP_BEGIN + idx > PVCLOCK_FIXMAP_END);
> > +
> > + pvti_base = (aligned_pvti_t *)__fix_to_virt(PVCLOCK_FIXMAP_BEGIN+idx);
> > +
> > + return &pvti_base[offset].info;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Unless I am missing something, if gcc decides to not inline get_pvti,
> this will break, right? I believe you need to mark that function with
> __always_inline.
Can't see why. Please enlighten me.
>
> > +static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
> > +{
> > + const struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *pvti;
> > + cycle_t ret;
> > + u64 last;
> > + u32 version;
> > + u32 migrate_count;
> > + u8 flags;
> > + unsigned cpu, cpu1;
> > +
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * When looping to get a consistent (time-info, tsc) pair, we
> > + * also need to deal with the possibility we can switch vcpus,
> > + * so make sure we always re-fetch time-info for the current vcpu.
> > + */
> > + do {
> > + cpu = __getcpu() & 0xfff;
>
> Please wrap this 0xfff into something meaningful.
OK.
> > + pvti = get_pvti(cpu);
> > +
> > + migrate_count = pvti->migrate_count;
> > +
> > + version = __pvclock_read_cycles(&pvti->pvti, &ret, &flags);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Test we're still on the cpu as well as the version.
> > + * We could have been migrated just after the first
> > + * vgetcpu but before fetching the version, so we
> > + * wouldn't notice a version change.
> > + */
> > + cpu1 = __getcpu() & 0xfff;
> > + } while (unlikely(cpu != cpu1 ||
> > + (pvti->pvti.version & 1) ||
> > + pvti->pvti.version != version ||
> > + pvti->migrate_count != migrate_count));
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!(flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT)))
> > + *mode = VCLOCK_NONE;
> > +
> > + last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last;
> > +
> > + if (likely(ret >= last))
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> Please add a comment here referring to tsc.c, where an explanation of
> this test lives. This is quite non-obvious for the non initiated.
OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
