On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:28:15 +0200
Gleb Natapov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 07:37:18PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> > We can check if accum_steal has any positive value instead of using
> > KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE bit in vcpu->requests; and this is the way we
> > usually do for accounting for something in the kernel.
> >
> Now you added check that will be done on each guest entry, requests
> mechanism prevents that.
Yes, +1 "if" for the case we have nothing in requests.
I'm not sure if setting and clearing a bit for that minor
optimization is worth it.
Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
