On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:54:22AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 10:07 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:36PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't really know what I'm doing messing around with realmode
> > > exception handling, but are we missing something like this:
> > >
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > @@ -4332,7 +4332,8 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > if (vcpu->arch.halt_request) {
> > > vcpu->arch.halt_request = 0;
> > > return kvm_emulate_halt(vcpu);
> > > - }
> > > + } else if (vcpu->mmio_needed)
> > > + return 0;
> > > return 1;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > The background is that I was playing around with when the MMIO regions
> > > of PCI assigned devices get direct mapped through KVM and start using
> > > memory slots and I found that the boot ROM on an e1000e card that I
> > > often use for testing causes the VM to hang when not directly mapped
> > > through a memory slot. This happens with both pci-assign and vfio-pci.
> > > Debugging further, I see the kernel instruction emulator decodes this
> > > and sets all the necessary flags and fragments for userspace to complete
> > > the access, but since it happened in real mode, vcpu_enter_guest always
> > > returns 1 and therefore KVM_RUN never exits to userspace and KVM gets
> > > stuck in an infinite loop re-handling this instruction.
> > >
> > > The above is pretty trivial and allows the ROM to work again. Is it
> > > correct? What other exceptions are we missing here that should allow an
> > > exit? This particular access generated a GP_VECTOR exception if we want
> > > to key on that somewhere. Thanks,
> > >
> > As far as I see the patch is nop. If handle_rmode_exception() returns 1
> > mmio_needed should be 0. Also if handle_rmode_exception() makes IO
> > according to the code qemu should exit with "KVM: exception 13 exit
> > (error code 0x0)" or something. Can you provide a ftrace for the hang?
>
> The real mode vector is GP_VECTOR, so handle_rmode_exception returns 1
> even though emulate_instruction returns EMULATE_DO_MMIO. Maybe the
Then #GP should be injected into a guest, which is incorrect of course.
> point at which handle_rmode_exception gets EMULATE_DO_MMIO from
> emulate_instruction is the point at which we should return 0.
Yes, this is likely what should be done here.
> I'll run
> an ftrace if it's still not clear how we're getting here. Thanks,
>
Yes please, I wonder what instruction is this. The code in
handle_exception() looks incorrect, but it is not clear to me me how to
fix it yet.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
