On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:07:31PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote: > The _very_ good reason here, is that we have two success cases: return > to guest and return to user space. As I said, we can save this state > in another bit somewhere and change all the KVM/ARM code to do so, but > the KVM guys back then would like to use the same convention as other > KVM archs.
Can you please credit me for not objecting to returning 0/1 to have different success meanings. What I'm merely objecting to is that "return -1" statement in the code (notice the negative sign.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
