The function deals with code segment too.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 77212d1..9bc68c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2759,7 +2759,7 @@ static __exit void hardware_unsetup(void)
        free_kvm_area();
 }
 
-static void fix_pmode_dataseg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int seg,
+static void fix_pmode_seg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int seg,
                struct kvm_segment *save)
 {
        if (!emulate_invalid_guest_state) {
@@ -2811,12 +2811,12 @@ static void enter_pmode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
        update_exception_bitmap(vcpu);
 
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_CS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_CS]);
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_SS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_SS]);
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_ES, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_ES]);
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_DS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_DS]);
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_FS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_FS]);
-       fix_pmode_dataseg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_GS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_GS]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_CS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_CS]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_SS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_SS]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_ES, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_ES]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_DS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_DS]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_FS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_FS]);
+       fix_pmode_seg(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_GS, &vmx->rmode.segs[VCPU_SREG_GS]);
 
        /* CPL is always 0 when CPU enters protected mode */
        __set_bit(VCPU_EXREG_CPL, (ulong *)&vcpu->arch.regs_avail);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to