On 19.02.2013, at 05:13, Scott Wood wrote:
> The existing check handles the case where we've migrated to a different
> core than we last ran on, but it doesn't handle the case where we're
> still on the same cpu we last ran on, but some other vcpu has run on
> this cpu in the meantime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[email protected]>
> ---
> This seems to have been the cause of the userspace segfaults I was
> seeing (the other TLB patches I posted are still needed as well).
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c
> index 1f89d26..8637689 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void kvmppc_mmu_msr_notify(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
> old_msr)
> void kvmppc_core_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> {
> struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500 = to_e500(vcpu);
> + static struct kvm_vcpu *last_vcpu_on_cpu[NR_CPUS];
Why not use DEFINE_PER_CPU?
Alex
>
> kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
>
> @@ -136,8 +137,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int
> cpu)
> mtspr(SPRN_GDEAR, vcpu->arch.shared->dar);
> mtspr(SPRN_GESR, vcpu->arch.shared->esr);
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.oldpir != mfspr(SPRN_PIR))
> + if (vcpu->arch.oldpir != mfspr(SPRN_PIR) ||
> + last_vcpu_on_cpu[smp_processor_id()] != vcpu) {
> kvmppc_e500_tlbil_all(vcpu_e500);
> + last_vcpu_on_cpu[smp_processor_id()] = vcpu;
> + }
>
> kvmppc_load_guest_fp(vcpu);
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
