Marcelo Tosatti wrote on 2013-03-20:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:24:37PM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Yang Zhang <[email protected]>
>>
>> reset/restore rtc_status when ioapic reset/restore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 1 +
>> virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> index 6fb22e3..a223170 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static inline int apic_test_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
>> return test_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
>> }
>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>> +
>> + return apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_ISR) ||
>> + apic_test_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Should hook into kvm_lapic_reset and kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_lapic to
> generate updates.
rtc_irq_restore will be called after lapic is restored. What's the problem if
we no hook into the two function?
>> static inline void apic_set_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
>> {
>> set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h index
>> 3a0f9d8..e2a03d1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h +++
>> b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h @@ -160,5 +160,6 @@ void
>> kvm_calculate_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>
>> void kvm_get_dest_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq,
>> unsigned long *vcpu_map);
>> +bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> index 659511d..6266d1f 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
>> @@ -88,6 +88,27 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct
> kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> +static void rtc_irq_reset(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>> +{
>> + ioapic->rtc_status.need_eoi = 0;
>> + bitmap_zero(ioapic->rtc_status.vcpu_map, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rtc_irq_restore(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> + int vector, i, need_eoi = 0, rtc_pin = 8;
>> +
>> + vector = ioapic->redirtbl[rtc_pin].fields.vector;
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, ioapic->kvm) {
>> + if (kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, vector)) {
>> + need_eoi++;
>> + set_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, ioapic->rtc_status.vcpu_map);
>
> Why set bit on vcpu_map here?
We will set need_eoi here. And if target vcpu is not in vcpu_map, then it will
not update need_eoi on EOI.
Best regards,
Yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
