On 21.03.2013, at 07:25, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> From: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>
>
> This patch adds the debug stub support on booke/bookehv.
> Now QEMU debug stub can use hw breakpoint, watchpoint and
> software breakpoint to debug guest.
>
> Debug registers are saved/restored on vcpu_put()/vcpu_get().
> Also the debug registers are saved restored only if guest is using
> debug resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2:
> - save/restore in vcpu_get()/vcpu_put()
> - some more minor cleanup based on review comments.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 22 +++-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c | 10 ++
> 4 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f4ba881..8571952 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -504,7 +504,17 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u32 mmucfg;
> u32 epr;
> u32 crit_save;
> + /* guest debug registers*/
> struct kvmppc_booke_debug_reg dbg_reg;
> + /* shadow debug registers */
> + struct kvmppc_booke_debug_reg shadow_dbg_reg;
> + /* host debug registers*/
> + struct kvmppc_booke_debug_reg host_dbg_reg;
> + /*
> + * Flag indicating that debug registers are used by guest
> + * and requires save restore.
> + */
> + bool debug_save_restore;
> #endif
> gpa_t paddr_accessed;
> gva_t vaddr_accessed;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 15f9a00..d7ce449 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> /* Select powerpc specific features in <linux/kvm.h> */
> #define __KVM_HAVE_SPAPR_TCE
> #define __KVM_HAVE_PPC_SMT
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG
>
> struct kvm_regs {
> __u64 pc;
> @@ -267,7 +268,24 @@ struct kvm_fpu {
> __u64 fpr[32];
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Defines for h/w breakpoint, watchpoint (read, write or both) and
> + * software breakpoint.
> + * These are used as "type" in KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl and "status"
> + * for KVM_DEBUG_EXIT.
> + */
> +#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_NONE 0x0
> +#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT (1UL << 1)
> +#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE (1UL << 2)
> +#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ (1UL << 3)
> struct kvm_debug_exit_arch {
> + __u64 address;
> + /*
> + * exiting to userspace because of h/w breakpoint, watchpoint
> + * (read, write or both) and software breakpoint.
> + */
> + __u32 status;
> + __u32 reserved;
> };
>
> /* for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG */
> @@ -279,10 +297,6 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
> * Type denotes h/w breakpoint, read watchpoint, write
> * watchpoint or watchpoint (both read and write).
> */
> -#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_NOTYPE 0x0
> -#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT (1UL << 1)
> -#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE (1UL << 2)
> -#define KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ (1UL << 3)
> __u32 type;
> __u32 reserved;
> } bp[16];
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index 1de93a8..bf20056 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,30 @@ static void kvmppc_vcpu_sync_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void kvmppc_vcpu_sync_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /* Synchronize guest's desire to get debug interrupts into shadow MSR */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr &= ~MSR_DE;
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr |= vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_DE;
> +#endif
> +
> + /* Force enable debug interrupts when user space wants to debug */
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> + /*
> + * Since there is no shadow MSR, sync MSR_DE into the guest
> + * visible MSR. Do not allow guest to change MSR[DE].
> + */
> + vcpu->arch.shared->msr |= MSR_DE;
> + mtspr(SPRN_MSRP, mfspr(SPRN_MSRP) | MSRP_DEP);
This mtspr should really just be a bit or in shadow_mspr when guest_debug gets
enabled. It should automatically get synchronized as soon as the next
vpcu_load() happens.
Also, what happens when user space disables guest_debug?
> +#else
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr |= MSR_DE;
> + vcpu->arch.shared->msr &= ~MSR_DE;
> +#endif
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Helper function for "full" MSR writes. No need to call this if only
> * EE/CE/ME/DE/RI are changing.
> @@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ void kvmppc_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 new_msr)
> kvmppc_mmu_msr_notify(vcpu, old_msr);
> kvmppc_vcpu_sync_spe(vcpu);
> kvmppc_vcpu_sync_fpu(vcpu);
> + kvmppc_vcpu_sync_debug(vcpu);
> }
>
> static void kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -736,6 +761,9 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DCR;
> return RESUME_HOST;
>
> + case EMULATE_EXIT_USER:
> + return RESUME_HOST;
This should get folded into the previous patch or be a separate one.
> +
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: emulation at %lx failed (%08x)\n",
> __func__, vcpu->arch.pc, vcpu->arch.last_inst);
> @@ -751,6 +779,30 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> }
>
> +static int kvmppc_handle_debug(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 dbsr = mfspr(SPRN_DBSR);
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBSR, dbsr);
This definitely deserves a comment :). Also, are we non-preemptible here?
> +
> + run->debug.arch.status = 0;
> + run->debug.arch.address = vcpu->arch.pc;
> +
> + if (dbsr & (DBSR_IAC1 | DBSR_IAC2 | DBSR_IAC3 | DBSR_IAC4)) {
> + run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT;
> + } else {
> + if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1W | DBSR_DAC2W))
> + run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE;
> + else if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1R | DBSR_DAC2R))
> + run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ;
> + if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1R | DBSR_DAC1W))
> + run->debug.arch.address =
> vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dac[0];
> + else if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC2R | DBSR_DAC2W))
> + run->debug.arch.address =
> vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dac[1];
> + }
> +
> + return RESUME_HOST;
Shouldn't this check for guest_debug and only go to user space if it asked for
debugging? Can't you just leave it at the old code for !guest_debug?
> +}
> +
> static void kvmppc_fill_pt_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> ulong r1, ip, msr, lr;
> @@ -1110,18 +1162,10 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DEBUG: {
> - u32 dbsr;
> -
> - vcpu->arch.pc = mfspr(SPRN_CSRR0);
> -
> - /* clear IAC events in DBSR register */
> - dbsr = mfspr(SPRN_DBSR);
> - dbsr &= DBSR_IAC1 | DBSR_IAC2 | DBSR_IAC3 | DBSR_IAC4;
> - mtspr(SPRN_DBSR, dbsr);
> -
> - run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> + r = kvmppc_handle_debug(run, vcpu);
> + if (r == RESUME_HOST)
> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> kvmppc_account_exit(vcpu, DEBUG_EXITS);
> - r = RESUME_HOST;
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -1172,7 +1216,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, 0);
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> - vcpu->arch.shadow_msr = MSR_USER | MSR_DE | MSR_IS | MSR_DS;
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr = MSR_USER | MSR_IS | MSR_DS;
> vcpu->arch.shadow_pid = 1;
> vcpu->arch.shared->msr = 0;
> #endif
> @@ -1527,12 +1571,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> return r;
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> -{
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> @@ -1638,16 +1676,194 @@ void kvmppc_decrementer_func(unsigned long data)
> kvmppc_set_tsr_bits(vcpu, TSR_DIS);
> }
>
> +static void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_put_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (!vcpu->arch.debug_save_restore)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Restore Host Context. Disable all debug events First */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, 0x0);
> + /* Disable pending debug event by Clearing DBSR */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBSR, mfspr(SPRN_DBSR));
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR1, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr1);
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR2, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr2);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR4, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr4);
> +#endif
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC1, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[0]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC2, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[1]);
> +#if CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_IACS > 2
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC3, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[2]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC4, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[3]);
> +#endif
> + mtspr(SPRN_DAC1, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dac[0]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_DAC2, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dac[1]);
> +
> + /* Enable debug events after all other debug registers restored */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr0);
How does the normal debug register switching code work in Linux? Can't we just
reuse that? Or rely on it to restore working state when another process gets
scheduled in?
> +
> + /* Host debug register are restored */
> + vcpu->arch.debug_save_restore = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Check whether guest still need debug resource, if not then there
> + * is no need to resotre guest context.
restore
> + */
> + if (!vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0)
> + return;
Are we guaranteed that debugging is disabled here? We don't want to get debug
exceptions that were meant for some other process.
> +
> + /*
> + * Save Host debug register only after restore. If host debug
> + * registers are saved and not restored then do not save again.
> + */
> + if (!vcpu->arch.debug_save_restore) {
> + /* Save Host context */
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_DBCR0);
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr1 = mfspr(SPRN_DBCR1);
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_DBCR2);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dbcr4 = mfspr(SPRN_DBCR4);
> +#endif
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[0] = mfspr(SPRN_IAC1);
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[1] = mfspr(SPRN_IAC2);
> +#if CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_IACS > 2
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[2] = mfspr(SPRN_IAC3);
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.iac[3] = mfspr(SPRN_IAC4);
> +#endif
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dac[0] = mfspr(SPRN_DAC1);
> + vcpu->arch.host_dbg_reg.dac[1] = mfspr(SPRN_DAC2);
> + vcpu->arch.debug_save_restore = true;
> + }
> +
> + /* Restore Guest Context. Disable all debug events First */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, 0x0);
> + /* Clear h/w DBSR */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBSR, mfspr(SPRN_DBSR));
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR1, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr1);
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR2, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr2);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR4, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr4);
> +#endif
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC1, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.iac[0]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC2, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.iac[1]);
> +#if CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_IACS > 2
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC3, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.iac[2]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_IAC4, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.iac[3]);
> +#endif
> + mtspr(SPRN_DAC1, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dac[0]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_DAC2, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dac[1]);
> +
> + /* Enable debug events after other debug registers restored */
> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> +{
> + struct kvmppc_booke_debug_reg *dbg_reg;
> + int n, b = 0, w = 0;
> + const u32 bp_code[] = {
> + DBCR0_IAC1 | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_IAC2 | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_IAC3 | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_IAC4 | DBCR0_IDM
> + };
> + const u32 wp_code[] = {
> + DBCR0_DAC1W | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_DAC2W | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_DAC1R | DBCR0_IDM,
> + DBCR0_DAC2R | DBCR0_IDM
> + };
> +
> + if (!(dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE)) {
> + /* Clear All debug events */
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 = 0;
> + vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
Ah, this is where we disable guest_debug. This needs to enable guest_debug for
the guest again, so you need to remove the DE bit from shadow_msrp here.
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 = 0;
> + /* Set DBCR0_EDM in guest visible DBCR0 register. */
> + vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr0 = DBCR0_EDM;
> +
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
> + vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IDM | DBCR0_IC;
> +
> + if (!(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP)) {
> + /* Code below handles only HW breakpoints */
> + kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load_debug_regs(vcpu);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + dbg_reg = &(vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg);
> +
> + /*
> + * On BOOKE (e500v2); Set DBCR1 and DBCR2 to allow debug events
> + * to occur when MSR.PR is set.
> + * On BOOKE-HV (e500mc+); MSR.PR = 0 when guest is running. So we
> + * should clear DBCR1 and DBCR2.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> + dbg_reg->dbcr1 = 0;
> + dbg_reg->dbcr2 = 0;
Does that mean we can't debug guest user space?
> +#else
> + dbg_reg->dbcr1 = DBCR1_IAC1US | DBCR1_IAC2US | DBCR1_IAC3US |
> + DBCR1_IAC4US;
> + dbg_reg->dbcr2 = DBCR2_DAC1US | DBCR2_DAC2US;
> +#endif
> +
> + for (n = 0; n < (KVMPPC_BOOKE_IAC_NUM + KVMPPC_BOOKE_DAC_NUM); n++) {
> + u32 type = dbg->arch.bp[n].type;
> +
> + if (!type)
> + break;
Not continue?
> +
> + if (type & (KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ |
> + KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE)) {
> + if (w >= KVMPPC_BOOKE_DAC_NUM)
> + continue;
This should result in an error, no?
> +
> + if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ)
> + dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= wp_code[w + 2];
> + if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE)
> + dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= wp_code[w];
> +
> + dbg_reg->dac[w] = dbg->arch.bp[n].addr;
> + w++;
> + } else if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT) {
> + if (b >= KVMPPC_BOOKE_IAC_NUM)
> + continue;
Same here.
> +
> + dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= bp_code[b];
> + dbg_reg->iac[b] = dbg->arch.bp[n].addr;
> + b++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load_debug_regs(vcpu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> {
> vcpu->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> current->thread.kvm_vcpu = vcpu;
> +
> + kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load_debug_regs(vcpu);
> }
>
> void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> current->thread.kvm_vcpu = NULL;
> vcpu->cpu = -1;
> +
> + kvmppc_booke_vcpu_put_debug_regs(vcpu);
> }
>
> int __init kvmppc_booke_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> index e78f353..cefdd38 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #define XOP_TLBRE 946
> #define XOP_TLBWE 978
> #define XOP_TLBILX 18
> +#define XOP_EHPRIV 270
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
> static int dbell2prio(ulong param)
> @@ -130,6 +131,15 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op(struct kvm_run *run, struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> emulated = kvmppc_e500_emul_tlbivax(vcpu, ea);
> break;
>
> + case XOP_EHPRIV:
> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> + run->debug.arch.address = vcpu->arch.pc;
> + run->debug.arch.status = 0;
> + kvmppc_account_exit(vcpu, DEBUG_EXITS);
> + emulated = EMULATE_EXIT_USER;
> + *advance = 0;
> + break;
> +
Looks good.
I would appreciate if you could split this patch up a bit more.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
