On 05/09/2013 02:44 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Rather than clearing the ACC_WRITE_MASK bit of pte_access in the
> "if (mmu_need_write_protect())" block not to call mark_page_dirty() in
> the following if statement, simply moving the call into the appropriate
> else block is better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 004cc87..08119a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2386,14 +2386,11 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
> __func__, gfn);
> ret = 1;
> - pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
> spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
> - }
> + } else
> + mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> }
>
> - if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK)
> - mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> -
> set_pte:
> if (mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte))
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
That function is really magic, and this change do no really help it. I had
several
patches posted some months ago to make these kind of code better understanding,
but
i am too tired to update them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
