Il 10/05/2013 09:23, Marc Zyngier ha scritto: >> > 1. Should we have a namespace per arch in the include directory, as in >> > include/kvm/arm? > So I thought of that at one point, but discarded the idea because it seems > to convey the wrong message: > We're moving the include files because they are architecture independent, > and referring to an architecture name in the path feels a bit odd. Or maybe > arm-common?
As I wrote in the other message, Linux in general has a shallow include/ tree, so I think putting them in include/kvm/ is good. Is there any precedent for naming stuff that is common to arm and aarch64? I think to 99% of the world they will both be "arm", but of course the remaining 1% is likely over-represented among KVM-ARM maintainers. :) Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
