On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> kvm_set_cr0 performs checks on the state transition that may prevent
> loading L1's cr0. For now we rely on the hardware to catch invalid
> states loaded by L1 into its VMCS. Still, consistency checks on the host
> state part of the VMCS on guest entry will have to be improved later on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 1f1da43..b43d1f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8186,7 +8186,7 @@ static void load_vmcs12_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>        * fpu_active (which may have changed).
>        * Note that vmx_set_cr0 refers to efer set above.
>        */
> -     kvm_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr0);
> +     vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr0);
>       /*
>        * If we did fpu_activate()/fpu_deactivate() during L2's run, we need
>        * to apply the same changes to L1's vmcs. We just set cr0 correctly,

For this one and 2,4,6 of the series:

Reviewed-by: Gleb Natapov <[email protected]>

--
                        Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to